Aleksandr Lyapunov
authored
Option memtx_tx_manager_use_mvcc_engine changes the behavior of transaction execution workflow. Usually that is implemented as direct check of memtx_tx_manager_use_mvcc_engine. But there are places in the code that rely on the fact that some pointers are set to not null if the engine is enabled. That's a bit confusing. Let's always check for memtx_tx_manager_use_mvcc_engine option when it's needed to determine which workflow must be executed. Note that checking of memtx_tx_manager_use_mvcc_engine option is more correct: in case of delete of nothing (delete statement when a tuple was not found by given key) all the pointers including old_tuple and new_tuple are null, while logically we still need to use mvcc execution workflow. Note also that in this case the mvcc engine does (and must do) almost nothing, so there was no bug in the previous behaviour. Part of #8122 NO_DOC=refactoring NO_TEST=refactoring NO_CHANGELOG=refactoring
Name | Last commit | Last update |
---|