Alexandr Lyapunov
authored
Now if an error happens during the first tuple push from port to obuf, the port is not actually destroyed - only the first tuple is unreferenced. I believe that port dump must not free any data at all, then once a user creates a port he must take the ownership and destroy it in the end of usage. That would simplify the user code, especially C++. Simplify port_dump function and destroy a port in the code that creates the port.
Name | Last commit | Last update |
---|