Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
user avatar
Alexandr Lyapunov authored
Now if an error happens during the first tuple push from port to
obuf, the port is not actually destroyed - only the first tuple is
unreferenced.

I believe that port dump must not free any data at all, then once
a user creates a port he must take the ownership and destroy it in
the end of usage. That would simplify the user code, especially C++.

Simplify port_dump function and destroy a port in the code that
creates the port.
bd04983a
History
Name Last commit Last update