Serge Petrenko
authored
The test failed with the following output: TAP version 13 1..3 # Started on Tue Jun 28 13:36:03 2022 # Starting group: pre-vote not ok 1 pre-vote.test_no_direct_connection # .../election_pre_vote_test.lua:46: expected: a value evaluating to true, actual: false # stack traceback: # .../election_pre_vote_test.lua:65: in function 'retrying' # .../election_pre_vote_test.lua:64: in function 'pre-vote.test_no_direct_connection' # ... # [C]: in function 'xpcall' ok 2 pre-vote.test_no_quorum ok 3 pre-vote.test_promote_no_quorum # Ran 3 tests in 6.994 seconds, 2 succeeded, 1 failed This is the moment when one of the followers disconnects from the leader and expects its `box.info.election.leader_idle` to grow. It wasn't taken into account that this disconnect might lead to leader resign due to fencing, and then a new leader would emerge and `leader_idle` would still be small. IOW, the leader starts with fencing turned off, and only resumes fencing, once it has connected to a quorum of nodes (one replica in this test). If the replica that we just connected happens to be the one we disconnect in the test, the leader might fence, if it hasn't yet connected to the other replica, because it immediately loses a quorum of healthy connections right after gaining it for the first time. Fix this by waiting until everyone follows everyone before each test case. The test, of course, could be fixed by turning fencing off, but this might hide any possible future problems with fencing. Follow-up #6654 Follow-up #6661 NO_CHANGELOG=test fix NO_DOC=test fix
Name | Last commit | Last update |
---|