Concurrent transactions can try to insert tuples that intersect only by
parts of secondary index: in this case when one of them gets prepared, the
others get conflicted, but the committed story does not get retained
(because the conflicting statements are not added to the committed story's
delete statement list as opposed to primary index) and is lost after
garbage collection: retain stories if there is a newer uncommitted story
in the secondary indexes' history chain.

Closes #7712

NO_DOC=bugfix