sql: rfc on prepared statements

doc/rfc/2592-prepared-statement.md

+# sql: prepared statements
+
+* **Status**: In progress
+* **Start date**: 08-06-2019
+* **Authors**: Nikita Pettik @korablev77 korablev@tarantool.org
+* **Issues**: #2592, #3292
+
+# Summary
+
+Currently, there's only one unified way to execute SQL queries: local
+(box.execute()) and remote (nb:connect():execute() where nb is net-box module)
+methods. Both functions have the same calling interface: they accept string
+of SQL statement to be executed and optionally list of parameters to be bound.
+For instance:
+
+`box.execute("SELECT * FROM t WHERE a = ?", {12})`
+
+Local version of :execute() calls SQL query execution mechanism right
+after invokation. Meanwhile remote version makes up IProto request, sends it
+to the server side (with IPROTO_SQL_TEXT and IPROTO_SQL_BIND keys) and waits
+for the response-result which is sent back to the client until execution of
+statement is finished.
+
+Prepared statement is a feature allowing to execute the same (parameterized)
+statement repeatedly without recompilation overhead. The typical workflow
+with prepared statement is as follows:
+
+1. Preparation stage: at first statement is prepared (i.e. compiled into
+   VDBE byte-code). At this moment parameters markers are left unspecified.
+   Compiled statement is saved into cache and re-compiled or invalidated only
+   on demand (e.g. after schema change).
+   :prepare() method returns handle (id, object with :execute() method
+   or whatever) which allows to execute query later. Alongside with
+   handle, :prepare() may return meta-information including types of
+   columns in resulting set, number of parameters and so forth.
+2. Execution stage: using mentioned handle, query can be located in cache.
+   In case there's any variables to be bound, they are substituted firstly.
+   Then byte-code implementing query is executed in virtual machine.
+
+Such two-stage schema has several advantages:
+
+ - It allows to avoid query compilation overhead: it may turn out to be
+   significant for queries with short run-time lifespan
+   (e.g.`INSERT INTO t VALUES (?);`);
+ - Prepared statements are resilient against SQL injections;
+ - It is required to implement functionality of SQL drivers (e.g. support
+   so called dry-run execution - prepare allows returning meta-information
+   without execution overhead).
+
+# Other vendors specifications
+
+## MySQL
+
+### SQL syntax [1]
+
+```
+PREPARE stmt FROM "SELECT SQRT(POW(?,2);" 
+SET @a = 2 
+EXECUTE stmt USING @a; 
+```
+
+As one can see, PREPARE statement creates named handle for prepared statement
+object which is further passed to EXECUTE statement alongside with values
+to be bound. Prepared statement can be deallocated (i.e. erased from cache)
+manually with DEALLOCATE PREPARE method.
+
+### Protocol support [2]
+
+COM_STMT_PREPARE is a command which creates a prepared statement from
+the passed query string via MySQL's binary protocol. The only argument
+is a string containing SQL query. If it is succeeded, it sends response
+COM_STMT_PREPARE_OK which consists of next fields (a few the least important
+are omitted):
+```
+ - statement_id 
+ - num_columns 
+ - num_params 
+ [optional] if num_params > 0 
+    [for each parameter] 
+        - parameter definition 
+ [optional] if num_columns > 0 
+    [for each column] 
+        - column definition 
+```
+Parameter definition may include next properties [3]: table name,
+column name, type, character set, length of fixed-length fields,
+default value etc. Column definition consists of the same fields,
+so in this case their bodies are unified.
+
+To execute prepared statement protocol declares COM_STMT_EXECUTE [4]
+command. It takes id of statement to be executed and list of parameters
+to be bound. In case of success it returns OK_Packet [5].
+
+Note there's no COM_STMT_PREPARE_AND_EXECUTE, i.e. protocol always
+requires preparation step.
+
+### Caching of Prepared Statements [6]
+
+Since prepared statements are supposed to be executed several times,
+the server converts the statement to an internal structure and caches that
+structure to be used during execution. In MySQL cache is session local:
+statements cached for one session are not accessible to other sessions.
+When session is closed, all statements are discarded. Moreover, statements
+are kept up to date (automatically re-compiled) in case of internal metadata
+changes caused by DDL operations. To limit number of prepared statements
+MySQL features `max_prepared_stmt_count` variable; setting it to 0 disables
+prepared statements at all.
+
+[1] https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/sql-syntax-prepared-statements.html  
+[2] https://dev.mysql.com/doc/internals/en/com-stmt-prepare-response.html  
+[3] https://dev.mysql.com/doc/internals/en/com-query-response.html#packet-Protocol::ColumnDefinition  
+[4] https://dev.mysql.com/doc/internals/en/com-stmt-execute.html  
+[5] https://dev.mysql.com/doc/internals/en/packet-OK_Packet.html  
+[6] https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/statement-caching.html  
+
+## PostgreSQL
+
+### SQL Syntax [1]
+
+```
+PREPARE fooplan (int, text, bool, numeric) AS INSERT INTO foo VALUES($1, $2, $3, $4);
+EXECUTE fooplan(1, 'Hunter Valley', 't', 200.00);
+```
+
+Usage is quite similar to one in MySQL: PREPARE creates named handle,
+which later can be executed with EXECUTE method.
+
+### Protocol support [2]
+
+Each SQL command can be executed via one of two sub-protocols. First
+(simple) one [3] accepts string containing SQL statement on the client
+side. On the server side, this request is parsed and executed "in one
+step", i.e. without preparation, binding parameters etc. This is quite
+similar to our current `:execute()` behaviour. Extended version of
+protocol [4] allows processing query in a series of steps: prepare,
+bind and execute. Firstly, client sends a `Parse` message, which contains
+SQL string and optionally name of statement to be prepared, number of
+parameters and their types (format of the messages can be seen here [5]).
+It is worth noting that specifying types for bindings can be quite
+meaningful in scope of improving static type system. If prepared
+statement is created unnamed (i.e. without specified name) it lasts only until
+the next `Parse` statement creating unnamed statement. Once a prepared
+statement exists, it can be readied for execution using a `Bind` message.
+`Bind` request accepts the name of prepared statement, the name of the
+destination portal (portal is an entry of the next stage of preparation),
+and the list of values to be bound. At this stage query planning takes
+place, and query plan can be cached if query is executed repeatedly. Once
+portal is created, it can be executed using `Execute` message. This request
+accepts name of portal and maximum result-row count (which allows suspending
+execution until the next call of `Execute` and sendind produced rows
+by batches - that's why it is called portal). In addition, there are several
+optional request types. For instance `Describe`, which returns meta-information
+of resulting set.
+
+### Caching of Prepared Statements [6]
+
+Prepared statements in PosgreSQL are local to session which means that they
+last for the duration of the current session and a single prepared statement
+cannot be used by multiple simultaneous database clients. Prepared statement
+not necessarily gets to the cache:
+
+"If a prepared statement is executed enough times, the server may
+eventually decide to save and re-use a generic plan rather than
+re-planning each time."
+
+[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/sql-prepare.html  
+[2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/protocol-overview.html  
+[3] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/protocol-flow.html#AEN99807  
+[4] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/protocol-flow.html#PROTOCOL-FLOW-EXT-QUERY  
+[5] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/protocol-message-formats.html  
+[6] https://jdbc.postgresql.org/documentation/head/server-prepare.html  
+
+## MS SQL Server
+
+It seems that manual prepare/execute interface is obsolete since
+MS Server provides automatic caching of queries based on their
+text representation. For details see: 
+
+https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/146092/microsoft-sql-server-prepared-statements 
+
+Still, one can use unnecessary sp_prepare/sp_execute interface:
+https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/system-stored-procedures/sp-prepare-transact-sql?view=sql-server-2017 
+
+# Implementation details
+
+## Interface
+
+Firstly, let's introduce separate method :prepare() which takes string
+containing SQL statement and optionally list containing types of parameters
+to be bound. Local interface:
+`box.prepare("SQL statement", {array_of_bindings})`.
+`box.prepare()` (and netbox analogue `nb:prepare()`) returns object comprising:
+id of prepared statement (calculated as value of hash function applied to the
+original text of SQL query), count of parameters to be bound, map containing
+types and names of parameters, names and types of fields forming resulting set.
+Handle created by local `box.prepare` function features also `:execute()` and
+`:unprepare()` methods. For example:
+```
+params_def = {}
+params_def[1] = "integer"
+params_def[2] = {}
+params_def[2]['@v'] = "number"
+local stmt = box.prepare("SELECT a, b, c FROM t WHERE a > ? AND a < @v", params_def)
+```
+`:prepare()` compiles statement and saves it to the prepared statement
+cache on server side and returns handle to the object representing prepared
+statement on the client side.
+```
+tarantool> stmt
+---
+- stmt_id: 1307020572
+  params_count: 2
+  params:
+  - name: '?'
+    type: integer
+  - name: '@v'
+    type: number
+  metadata:
+  - name: A
+  - type: integer
+  - name: B
+  - type: integer
+  - name: C
+  - type: integer
+  execute: 'function: 0x010e720450'
+  unprepare: 'function 0x030e430240'
+...
+```
+To avoid breaking current interface, let's assume that all unspecified
+variables have most general type ANY:
+```
+cn:prepare("SELECT ?;")
+---
+- stmt_id: 1307020572
+  params_count: 1
+  params:
+  - name: '?'
+    type: ANY
+  metadata:
+  - name: '?'
+  - type: ANY
+...
+```
+When bindings are about to be substituted (via `:execute()` call), they
+are firstly checked to be of specified types. In case of type mismatch an
+error is raised.
+
+Remote `:prepare()` and `:unprepare()` make up IProto request with new
+IPROTO_PREPARE command. In case body contains IPROTO_SQL_TEXT key, this
+command is considered to be prepare request; if body comprises IPROTO_STMT_ID
+key, command is supposed to mean unprepare request. What is more,
+IPROTO_EXECUTE command now is overloaded in the same way: it can accept both
+IPROTO_SQL_TEXT and IPROTO_STMT_ID keys. Depending on request key, execute
+command may result either in casual compile-and-execute procedure or execution
+of prepared statement.
+
+## Prepared statement handle
+
+Different vendors use different handles to identify prepared statements.
+For instance, MySQL relies on sequential numeric ids; PosgreSQL gives
+unique character names to each prepared statement; Cassandra uses MD5
+hash of original query as a prepared statement id. In current approach it is
+suggested to use numeric ids (values of hash function applied to the original
+string of SQL query) as prepared statement identifiers. To not bother with
+remembering ids on client side, users should operate on opaque
+`:execute()` method of prepared statement's handle. For example:
+```
+local stmt = box.prepare("SELECT ?;") 
+stmt:execute({1}) 
+--- 
+- rows: 
+  - [1] 
+```
+Now call of `:execute(args)` under the hood unfolds to
+`box.execute(stmt.query_id, args)` that is automatically substitutes
+appropriate id of prepared statement. The same concerns `:unprepare()` method.
+
+## Cache
+
+There's two main approaches concerning cache implementation. First one
+assumes that the prepared statement cache is session local; second one -
+that there's one cache which is global to all sessions. Session local
+cache allows specific queries to be kept in different places so that they
+wouldn't replace each other. For instance, DML requests can be executed
+and cached through the one session (`INSERT INTO t VALUES (?);`),
+meanwhile data selection occurs through another one. However, in this case
+sessions can't share one prepared statement object, which leads to possible
+performance issues. Thus, in Tarantool SQL it is suggested to use global
+holder for prepared statements. Also, it is worth mentioning that cache in
+fact is is not 'cache' in terms of invalidation policy: entries are erased
+from cache only on explicit unprepare requests or session's disconnect.
+Moreover, after any DDL operation all prepared statements are considered to be
+expired. Expired entry can't be executed without re-preparation. Size of
+cache is configured by `box.cfg.sql_cache_size` handle. There's also statistics
+available in box.info:sql().cache:
+ - `size` is a total amount of memory consumed by prepared statements;
+ - `stmt_count` is a number of prepared statements statement.
+
+When `:execute()` method is called and entry is found in prepared
+statement cache, it should be copied before execution. Cloning is
+required since byte-code can be self-modified during execution.
+Moreover, it allows dealing with statement duplicates, like:
+```
+stmt1 = box.prepare("SELECT 1;") 
+stmt2 = box.prepare("SELECT 1;") 
+
+stmt1:unprepare() 
+stmt2:execute() 
+```
+Instead of adding query duplicates to the prepared statement cache,
+reference counter of corresponding prepared statement is incremented.
+Note that duplicates imply that several sessions can share one prepared
+statement. When reference counter reaches zero, prepared statement is to
+be deleted. What is more, copying solves another problem. During execution of
+huge SELECT query which may contain yields (for instance, UDF with sleep()),
+and if at the same time another session attempts at executing the same prepared
+statement, it will fail (or simply result in compile-and-execute procedure)
+since instance of prepared statement contains run-time atrributes (program
+counter, memory cells state and so on). Finally, another session firstly can
+invalidate prepared statement by executing DDL operation, and then re-compile
+statement currently being executed. The last scenarion may result in
+unpredictable consequences.
+
+It is supposed that there's no auto-caching (at least now). It means
+that query can get to the prepared statement cache only if explicit
+`:prepare()` invokation has taken place and is invalidated only by
+user request (or at the end of session).
+
+It is worth mentioning that each prepared statement also is assigned
+with schema version at the moment of its creation. If current schema version
+is different from prepared statement's one, error is raised saying that
+prepared statement is expired and it requires re-compilation.