-
Mergen Imeev authored
The test re encoding of -2^63 Lua number value did use update by a field name, which does not supported in 1.10 and 2.2 branches. Field name updates are orthogonal to Lua number serialization and we don't intend to test them here. So it is safe and logical to get rid of them in the test. This change allow the test to pass on 1.10 and 2.2 branches. Follows up #4672. Reviewed-by:
Alexander Tikhonov <avtikhon@tarantool.org> Reviewed-by:
Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> (cherry picked from commit 408b9ad4)
Mergen Imeev authoredThe test re encoding of -2^63 Lua number value did use update by a field name, which does not supported in 1.10 and 2.2 branches. Field name updates are orthogonal to Lua number serialization and we don't intend to test them here. So it is safe and logical to get rid of them in the test. This change allow the test to pass on 1.10 and 2.2 branches. Follows up #4672. Reviewed-by:
Alexander Tikhonov <avtikhon@tarantool.org> Reviewed-by:
Alexander Turenko <alexander.turenko@tarantool.org> (cherry picked from commit 408b9ad4)
gh-4672-min-integer-value-in-serializer.test.lua 1.03 KiB