fix: improve "not in" motion policies
Previously we used a pessimistic approach with a full motion for "not in" operator. But after some research it seems that we can use the same logic as we do for equality and "in" operator, i.e. choose either local, either segment or either full motion policies.
Showing
- src/ir/transformation/redistribution.rs 3 additions, 8 deletionssrc/ir/transformation/redistribution.rs
- src/ir/transformation/redistribution/tests.rs 3 additions, 0 deletionssrc/ir/transformation/redistribution/tests.rs
- src/ir/transformation/redistribution/tests/not_in.rs 104 additions, 0 deletionssrc/ir/transformation/redistribution/tests/not_in.rs
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment